THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS
Master Studio – Mediating Tactics
Like every field of knowledge and action, architecture has its own more or less distinctive myths, modes and means. Some of those have a very long history, and still cast their shadows on how architecture is engaged as discipline and practice. They condition what is thinkable, doable, and acceptable within the domain of architecture, or in other words, implicitly define what issues architecture needs to address, and how this must be done. To a large extent, institutions of education tend to sustain this, since they draw a big part of their legitimation on the perpetuation of a disciplinary field, and the associated cultures. Those institutions also have a hold on (or set the agenda for) what needs to be taught* and learned, in order to ultimately be granted access to the discipline and subsequently be able to act within it.
In this studio we will take a shot at (some of) those myths, modes and means. Based on the conditions set by the urgencies of ‘now’, we will speculate** on what architecture actually needs to pay attention to, and attempt to develop strategies, stories and tools for doing so. The triad composed of the concepts ‘Myths, Modes and Means’ is meant as a heuristic device for structuring process and actions:
Myths – the stories we tell ourselves and others, and that help us to imagine, underscore and legitimise our actions.
Modes – the ways in which we work and how that conditions what we do, how we think and what we produce.
Means – what we appropriate, extract, and use for the purposes we set.
The studio draws upon the idea of the uninvited practice; i.e. a practice that is based upon anticipation and agenda-setting, rather than a practice that responds post-factum to pre-given and pre-defined tasks. The name given to this studio refers to this fundamental inversal of position. Following desription quite accurately depicts the attitude connected to this kind of practice: ‘… acutely aware of the social power of architecture, but also of the art and urgency of harnessing it. Architecture as an uncompromising tool for highlighting the scale of the world and persistently calling it into question. Armed with a merciless but humorous logic, a firm belief in the freedom of the individual and a far-reaching concern for ecology, … to hold up a mirror to citizens and politicians. Always uninvited. Quite simply, because it is necessary. The fact that the majority of projects will never be built is now beside the point. They exist and stubbornly continue to call attention to the vital issues’ (Peter Swinnen on https://www.vai.be/en/expos-en-programma/luc-deleu-t-o-p-office-future-plans-1970-2020). The idea of the ‘uninvited practice’ is not a new one, and it has succesfully been approriated and implemented by for instance Superstudio, Archigram, Ant Farm, Haus Rücker, Yona Friiedman, Cedric Price, T.O.P.-office, FLC, Forensic Architecture, Philippe Rahm and others. When in action, all of them were/are explicitly dedicated, voluntaristic and aware of what matters. They are all good company, though setting high and challenging standards.
At this stage the expectations regarding possible outcomes are open, quite simply because the landscape of questioning is open. The one thing that is certain for now, is that what comes out at the end, will by necessity be multi-modal, i.e. making use of the plethora of expressive possibilities that is available in the world of architecture.
taught* > teaching: impart knowledge to or instruct (someone) as to how to do something.
speculate** > form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence: conjecture, theorize, form theories, hypothesize, make suppositions, postulate, guess, make guesses, surmise; think, wonder, muse.